I am not a supporter or sponsor of any major party but I was taken back by this cover on the Daily Telegraph on Monday's paper, the day after the election date was announced.
(image from the Australian newpaper 7.8.13)
I am glad that I was not the only one. This FB campaign has started, saying we should complain when the "information pamphlets" cross the line.
I would be interested to hear what others have seen and heard on the campaign trail so far.
This type of propaganda has to make you realize that we, as voters, need to be really discerning with what messages we allow ourselves to read and believe. The media is not a neutral medium that is just providing information. After this came out there have been many articles about the political agenda of a certain media owner. (see here and here)
I actually see parallels with the communist propaganda posters of the former USSR and of China. The way that posters and other media was and is used to control the masses and to make a large number of people conform to a socialist way of thinking. There is good and bad socialist undertakings (public health is an example is good). But, at all points, discernment is required.
Love to know your thoughts on the election propaganda (or of socialism in Australia)
Thought this was an interesting way to fight back:
I don't know what to think about this - still struggling to believe that it's for real. (I saw it with my own eyes too). Are people influenced by this? If so, which way ? - I think there are plausible justifications for this altering voting intentions in either direction.
ReplyDeleteAt least the issue is settled about whether there is bias or not in the Murdoch papers
News break -- newspaper puts up a headline that helps it sell newspapers. In other new the Age has assumed an air of superiority on the topic.
ReplyDeleteFair call Tom. But it would appear that this newspaper either thinks all it's readers are Liberals or that they are trying to push an agenda that they should be.
ReplyDelete